The Impact of Attorneys on Judicial Decisions: empirical evidence from civil cases

Autores: Caio Castelliano de Vasconcelos, Eduardo Watanabe de Oliveira, Waldir Leôncio Netto

Informações

Sessão 15: 16h00-17h30 - Sala 109 - Bloco C - Térreo
Coordenador: Breno Giovanni Adaid Castro, Centro Universitário IESB, Brasília, Brasil.

Resumo

This article analyses the impact of attorneys on the outcome of judicial decisions in civil cases. We currently have little quantitative information about the effect of attorneys on the outcome of civil cases due to (i) the nonrandom pairing of attorneys and cases and (ii) the difficulty in accurately defining what a favorable decision in a civil case is. The Office of the Solicitor General of the Union in Brazil presents a unique research opportunity, since it assigns cases among its attorneys on a random basis and has standardized rules to record outcomes of civil cases. We analyzed the work performed by 386 Federal Attorneys and their impact on 30,821 judicial decisions. Significant win-rate differences among attorneys were detected in half of the 70 teams surveyed. The fact that attorneys achieve different outcomes, despite working in the same type of cases, indicates how judicial decisions can be affected by the work of a attorney in the civil area. No statistical correlation between attorney experience and outcome of civil cases was detected.

Palavras-chave